(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.01 2017가단536469

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.01 2017가단536469

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from September 29, 2017 to February 1, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a legal couple who completed the marriage report on October 24, 2002, and the plaintiff had 1 South (2004) and 1 woman (2009) under the sus.

B. C entered and worked as a member of D around 2013, and around 2014, Defendant also became a member of D and engaged in business activities.

C, while serving at the material management department, he/she had his/her business from time to time with the defendant, and around July 2014, he/she made a trip with the defendant for 2-day and 3-day trip with the defendant.

After the fact, the plaintiff had been seriously challenged with C.

C. Around March 2015, C retired from employment to E (hereinafter “E”) after closing his/her position, and in E, he/she worked as an intra-company director or worked as an intra-company director and auditor respectively. D.

C and the defendant set golf together with F on August 30, 2017, and completed a flup of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the

E. Accordingly, although the Plaintiff demanded C to adjust the relationship with the Defendant and only the company, C rather requested C to divorce.

F. On December 27, 2017, the Plaintiff and C divorced by filing a report of divorce by agreement.

[Based on recognition] Each description and image of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number), significant facts, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

(a) A third party who commits a tort shall not interfere with a married couple’s community life falling under the essence of marriage, such as interfering with a couple’s community life by causing the failure of a married couple’s community life;

In principle, a third party's act of infringing on or interfering with a marital life falling under the essence of marriage by committing an unlawful act with either side of the married couple, and infringing on the right as the spouse to inflict mental pain on the spouse.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2021.03.10 2020가단16473

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.05.25 2019가단5170235

-창원지방법원통영지원 2019.12.10 2019가단23458

-춘천지방법원영월지원 2019.06.26 2018가단12143

-부산지방법원 2017.04.13 2016가단25832