1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by imprisonment for three months;

2. Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On February 7, 2018, Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Military Service Act at the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 15, 2018.

[2] Around June 10, 2017, the Defendants suggested that Defendant A and Defendant C receive money from a mobile phone with the knowledge of the fact that Defendant A (the age of 19) came to know of the victim D (the age of 19) that he was aware of in the juvenile reformatory around Jun. 10, 2017, Defendant B and Defendant C came to open one mobile phone at Samsung Ggallon. Defendant B and Defendant C consented thereto, thereby inducing the victim, and Defendant B and Defendant C conspired to commit a theft of the mobile phone owned by the victim.

Defendants are located in the K5 passenger cars set up in the front of the Busan Local Police Agency located in the city of 1000 (Yansan-dong), located in the center of the Busan Local Police Agency at around 14:00 on the same day, Defendant A left the victim, and Defendant C took the same place as the victim was a mobile phone purchaser who was listed on the car, and Defendant C took the cell phone of the amount of KRW 1,00,000,000 from the victim’s market price.

required to report.

“.....”

Defendant A continued to leave the victim from a car, and the mobile phone price will be found later.

As we understand, the escape is the same as the defendant, and the defendant B operated the car with the defendant C without the defendant C, and escaped as it is.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiries, such as criminal history, and the text of the judgment;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: each of the Defendants, Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act;

2. Defendant B who handles concurrent crimes: After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act;

3. Defendants to be mitigated of small amount: each of the Defendants and Article 53 of the Criminal Code.