logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.10.05 2018가합794
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a member of the G constituency in Chungcheongnam-nam EF Group, and Defendant C is a company producing and broadcasting the broadcast program “D” (hereinafter “instant broadcast program”), and Defendant B is the president of the news reporting division of Defendant C Co., Ltd., and is poppy of the instant broadcast program.

The Defendants, on May 7, 2018, as the title “I” from the “H” of the instant broadcast program, refer to the calendar following the sinking of the Sewol Ferry on April 16, 2014 at the sea near the tidal Map of Jindo-do, Jindo-do, Jindo-do. The same is the same.

In commenting on the contents of the common sense of the bereaved families, a broadcast of approximately 15 seconds on the screen of the caption, “a member of the J Party at the time of A,” which reads the same sense as that of the deceased.

(2) The Defendants asserted the purport of Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings through the report of this case, thereby undermining the Plaintiff’s reputation by openly expressing the false facts that “the plaintiff was sleeping to the deceased and slicking the deceased families of the deceased during the Sewol ferry.”

Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to broadcast a correction report stating that the report of this case is false as a disposition appropriate for restoring honor, jointly and severally paid KRW 100 million for the Plaintiff’s mental compensation due to such unlawful act.

(1) In light of the following facts and circumstances, the Defendants, through the instant report, made a statement of fact that could undermine the social evaluation of the Plaintiff’s judgment, and based on the overall purport of the Plaintiff’s statements and arguments, the following facts and circumstances are acknowledged: (a) the Plaintiff made a statement that “the Plaintiff had a statement of fact that the bereaved families of the deceased in the Sewol ferry were not on the deceased in the old.”

arrow