A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In light of the above legal principles, the Defendant’s signature was forged and forged without authority, and the Defendant’s signature was forged and forged without authority for the purpose of exercising the right to file a report on the circumstances of driving under the circumstances of driving under which the Defendant’s name was written in the driver’s name “F,” which is the type of the Defendant’s name, to be punished for driving under drinking, etc., and the Defendant’s signature was forged and forged without authority for the purpose of exercising the right to file the said report on the circumstances of driving under the State’s name on the job.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving under the liquor:

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each license ledger;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2, Article 44 (1) (the point of drinking alcohol), Article 152 subparagraph 1, Article 43 of the Traffic Act, Article 239 (2) (the point of exercising the signature of the company) and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of exercising the signature of the company) of the relevant Act;

1. Punishment for a violation of the provisions of Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (a punishment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving) as stated in the judgment, and a punishment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act as stated above with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor (limited to a crime of violating the Traffic Act on the road as stated);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the said Act [the punishment shall be aggravated by the punishment specified for the crime of causing concurrent crimes, the crimes of which are heavier than the punishment, but the lower limit shall be the punishment specified for the crime of causing concurrent crimes in violation of the Road Traffic Act];

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution. Article 62 (1) of the same Act

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the Order to Attend Education is also the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act* the record of the same crime, and the fact that the crime of this case was committed, and the concealment of the crime was committed. * There is no record of punishment heavier than the fine, and criminal conviction is more favorable than that of the defendant. * The above circumstances and the defendant's age, sex behavior, and circumstances after the crime should be taken into account.