All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

Defendant A is the representative director of Defendant B, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of civil engineering, building structure design, supervision, etc.

1. On April 22, 2014, Defendant A: (a) around 22, 2014, at the corporate office located in the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building 502, the Defendant acquired 14 Acrobat program copyright of which the fish program system business calcosp is holding the program copyright; (b) 9 AutCAD program holding the program copyright; (c) 15 and 10 Crodow7 program holding the program copyright; (d) 53 program holding the program copyright; (e) 9 program holding the program copyright; (e) 2.0 program holding the program copyright; (f) alcosp, Inc. 6; (f) 10 program; and (f) alcosp 12 program with knowledge of infringement on the copyright of each program; and (f) alcosp, Inc. acquired the copyright of each program and used it for profit-making purposes.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, has a duty of care to ensure that A, the representative director of the defendant, does not infringe on the copyright of the program of the defendant company.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and infringed the copyright of the victims by allowing them to acquire illegal reproductions of the program held by the above victims and use them for business purposes.

Defendant A who is subject to the applicable provisions of Acts to charged facts in the market: The defendant B corporation under Articles 136 (2) 4 and 124 (1) 3 of each Copyright Act: The main sentence of Article 141, Articles 136 (2) 4 and 124 (1) 3 of each Copyright Act: The judgment dismissing the prosecution in general under Article 140 (1) 1 of each Copyright Act.