1. The plaintiffs' primary claims are dismissed.

2. The Defendant’s waste treatment against N on November 11, 2015.

1. Details of the disposition;

가. 주식회사 N(이하 ‘소외 회사’라고 한다)은 사업장폐기물 중간재활용업을 영위하기 위하여 2015. 10. 6.경 피고에게 경기 가평군 O 외 1필지(이하 ‘이 사건 신청지’라고 한다)에 폐기물 재활용시설(이하 ‘이 사건 폐기물처리시설’이라고 한다)을 설치하고 폐가전제품(실외기), 폐알루미늄샷시, 폐전선 등 사업장폐기물을 파쇄, 분쇄 및 선별하여 중간가공 폐기물을 만들겠다는 내용의 폐기물처리 사업계획서(이하 ‘이 사건 사업계획서’라고 한다)를 제출하였다.

B. After reviewing the instant project plan pursuant to Article 25(2) of the Wastes Control Act, the Defendant issued a notice of suitability (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Nonparty Company on November 11, 2015.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1, 2, and 9, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. Whether the lawsuit of this case is lawful

A. The defendant asserts that the plaintiff does not have standing to sue since the disposition of this case does not fall under cases where the interests protected by law are violated or are likely to be infringed.

The first sentence of Article 12 of the Administrative Litigation Act provides that a litigation for revocation may be instituted by a person who has a legal interest in seeking the revocation of a disposition, etc., and Article 35 provides that a lawsuit for confirmation of nullity, etc. may be brought by a person who has a legal interest in seeking the confirmation of validity or existence of a disposition, etc.

I would like to say.

The legal interests protected here are individual, direct, and specific that are protected by the basis laws and regulations of the disposition in question and relevant laws and regulations.