logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.07.19 2018고단1897
보험사기방지특별법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant used four insurance products that are insurance products of AIA life insurance companies, such as “non-distribution essential health renewal insurance”, to purchase insurance products of four insurance companies, and used them to claim insurance proceeds with a false or excessive certificate of discharge.

The Defendant: (a) from October 26, 2016 to November 8, 2011 of the same year at the F Hospital located in Gwangju Northern-gu, the name of the bottle, “in the name of the essential part of the air-conditioning, the air-conditioning, the air-conditioning, and the air-conditioning”; (b) from around December 5, 2016 to around December 13, 2016 to around December 14, 201, the name of the bottle, “in the name of the air-conditioning wings and tension; (c) the mouth of the froke, the fluor, the fluor, and the tension”; and (d) from February 10, 2017

3. From May 22, 2017 to May 22, 2017, under the name of the sick person, “the vice versa” for 16 days until July 16.

6. For up to 15 days from June 15, 201, each insurance claim was filed with the victim AI life insurance company, Hyundai Marine Insurance company, ACE non-life insurance company, and Meart life insurance company, such as the victim AI life insurance company, Hyundai Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., ACE non-life insurance company, and Meart Meart, for 12 times from the time until June 15, 2017, under the name of the disease called "pathal signboard disability accompanied by the relevant chronic root disease, e.g., e., e., e., e., e., f., each hospital.

However, the Defendant was able to receive hospital treatment, so there was no need to receive hospital treatment, and even if he was partially receiving hospital treatment during the period of hospitalization, most of the time was not living at hospital, and there was no fact that he was receiving hospital treatment normally, such as staying in the hospital or in his residence.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received a certificate of entrance/discharge from the F hospital as if he had been faithfully hospitalized during the hospitalization period, and claimed insurance money from the victims, and the victim AI life insurance company around November 9, 2016.

arrow