1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that is established on September 26, 1921 and ordinarily employs approximately seven hundred workers and runs the business of publishing and selling newspapers. On April 22, 2014, the Plaintiff is a corporation that is engaged in the business of selling and selling newspapers. The Plaintiff is a corporation D (hereinafter “the subsidiaries of this case”).

2) The intervenor was employed by the plaintiff on September 16, 1987 and was engaged in advertising collection business in the advertising bureau or AD headquarters. On February 28, 2003, the intervenor was a person whose class was higher than the vice head.

B. On December 24, 2014, the Plaintiff notified the Intervenor that the Intervenor would be dispatched to the instant subsidiary after undergoing an interview with E, the head of AD headquarters. On December 26, 2014, the Plaintiff notified the Intervenor that the Intervenor would be dispatched to the instant subsidiary. On December 26, 2014, the personnel order for dispatching the Intervenor to the instant subsidiary (hereinafter “instant personnel order”).

(2) On December 29, 2014, the Intervenor was affiliated with the management support team of the instant subsidiary and engaged in the acquisition and transfer of business affairs with F, a full-time officer from December 29, 2014. However, on December 30, 2014, the Intervenor revealed that most of the business affairs taken over and taken over are financial and accounting affairs that require expertise, and that the Intervenor cannot normally perform his/her business affairs due to his/her lack of full experience, and was waiting at the office to suspend and refuse the acquisition and transfer of business affairs.

3) During the period from January 30, 2014 to January 13, 2015, the Intervenor requested for the adjustment of business affairs or the revocation of the instant personnel order by holding an interview with the representative director of the instant subsidiary and the head of the management support team. Accordingly, the instant subsidiary demanded the Intervenor to resume the takeover of business affairs, and sent a written notification on January 14, 2015, and a peremptory notice on January 15, 2015, respectively. 4) The instant subsidiary held a personnel committee on January 22, 2015 to the Intervenor on the ground that “the Intervenor refuses to take over business affairs and refuses to perform business affairs”: the period of suspension from office for six-month suspension from office for the reason that “the Intervenor refuses to take over business affairs and refuses to perform business affairs: January 23, 20

7. 22. The decision was made on the disciplinary action, against which this decision was made.