logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.05 2015가합548870
영업비밀 침해채무 부존재확인의 소
Text

1. Following the use of the Plaintiffs’ manufacturing process and equipment by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1 of the parties is the Plaintiff Company A (hereinafter “Plaintiff Company”);

On May 26, 2015, “D Co., Ltd.” is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing, selling, exporting, and importing, etc. of miscarriage germs and milk products. Plaintiff B is a company that enters the Defendant around March 20, 200 and works as the head of the production2 team and the head of the quality assurance team, etc., while taking charge of product development, facility management, etc., and immediately join the Plaintiff Company and works as the head of the general business division after withdrawal on November 30, 2007. 2) The Defendant is a company that engages in the business of manufacturing, etc. of effective milk products.

B. On May 18, 2011, the Defendant entered the Plaintiffs in the Busan District Court’s separate list of the Defendant’s trade secrets (hereinafter “Defendant’s materials”) against the Plaintiffs on May 18, 2011.

(2) On January 29, 2015, the appellate court filed a lawsuit claiming the destruction, suspension of operation, or use of the machinery ( apparatus) used by the Plaintiff Company on the ground that it acquired and used the machinery without authority. On May 31, 2012, the above appellate court partially accepted the Defendant’s claim for damages and rendered a judgment dismissing the remainder of the claim. (2) The Defendant filed an appeal with the Busan High Court against the above judgment, and added the Defendant’s claim for the extension of the claim for damages, prohibition of disclosure, prohibition of use, and prohibition of production, transfer, etc. of trade secret infringement products and raw materials, and the aforementioned appellate court against the Plaintiffs as of January 2012 or 5445, (1) paid damages to each of the Plaintiffs to the Defendant, and (2) discarded the Defendant’s materials to any person other than the Defendant, and (3) was used by the Plaintiff Company (hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff Company).

arrow