Defendants are not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendants, together with Defendant A’s activities at the I club, gathered that Defendant A had the complainant paid the construction cost in a way that the complainant would not pay the construction cost, and that Defendant A would have the victim paid the construction cost in lieu of the victim’s personal history, connection, etc.; and (b) had the complainant paid it in lieu of the construction cost.

At the construction site located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City around November 2009, the Defendants agreed that Defendant A would directly reduce the construction cost, and the rest of the construction work would be paid with the construction cost (the portion of the glass and windows, etc. directly performed by the complainant) and the loan and interest rate until the end of March 2010 if the construction cost is currently short of the construction cost. In addition, the Defendants would provide one employee at the construction site with a monthly wage. At the construction site, the number of employees will be paid. At the beginning of February through March, 2009, the number of employees will be more than 6.7 billion won per month revenue and more than 6.7 billion won per month, and regardless of the completion of the construction work, Defendant B would be able to make the complainant to develop the restaurant in Busan.

However, in fact, the construction site of this case was intended to build a restaurant by lending money from the Defendants to others, such as the complainants, and the Defendants did not have any intention or ability to repay due to the absence of any particular property or income.

Defendants shall have the complainant do construction of the windows and windows equivalent to 37,730,000 won at the market price between December 15, 2009 and January 20, 2010, and 2) on December 8, 2009.