beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. In this case, where the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance basically accepts the same assertion as the judgment of the court of first instance, this court shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasons for this court are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance other than
4 lines below the three pages of the judgment of the court of first instance shall add "A deposit of the lease of this case" to "A deposit of the lease of this case on May 2016."
The testimony of the witness G in the judgment of the court of first instance 9th, which is the ground for recognition, shall be described as "the testimony of the witness G" in the judgment of the court of first instance as "the testimony of the witness G of the court of first instance", and the "the result of the entrustment of the appraisal of the premium for L of this court" as "the result of the entrustment
"The same as recognized in the above basic facts" in the 11th sentence of the first instance court shall be stated as follows:
As recognized in the above basic facts, according to the evidence No. 24, the Plaintiff’s new lessee’s J on May 28, 2018, it is doubtful that “in the event that the hospital is additionally confined in the building of this case, the hospital bears the burden of attracting the hospital and increases the monthly rent. However, it seems that the Defendant would not enter into a lease contract with the Defendant that he/she intends to rent while paying a reasonable amount of premium. Even if a lease contract is concluded by mutual coordination, it would not maintain a smooth lease relationship with the Defendant, and it would be recognized that the new lessee sent e-mail to the effect that the second premium contract was cancelled, “No. 16, No. 17, No. 1931 through No. 27, No. 1937, Nov. 1, 2018,” and “No. 16, No. 1937, Nov. 1, 201, No. 2013-31, No. 1937,” respectively.