1. Of the instant lawsuit, the details of unpaid indemnities (i) through (iii) the payment demand and late payment charge as stated in the separate sheet.

1. The fact that the Defendant, on June 10, 2014, occupied the Plaintiff without permission from September 17, 2006 to April 30, 2013, 21.5 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) out of 12,378 square meters in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City’s school site B from September 17, 2006 to April 30, 2013, notified the Plaintiff of the payment demand of compensation and late payment charges (hereinafter “instant notification”), as stated in the attached Form, as well as the fact that the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the Plaintiff, but filed an administrative appeal by the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office of Education on October 28, 2014, the fact that the Plaintiff was subject to the dismissal ruling by the administrative appeals commission by the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office

2. Determination

A. The instant notification imposing excessive amount of indemnity and arrears is unlawful in view of the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s assertion resided in a building without permission on the instant land for a considerable period of 20 years; (b) received compensation from the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu Office for project implementation and completed relocation on September 2009; (c) did not fully recognize the fact that the Plaintiff occupied the instant land; (d) at the time the Plaintiff’s residence was dangerous for removal because the unauthorized Building was attached to a densely-populated area; (e) the Plaintiff’s receipt of indemnity for obstacles from the Nowon-gu office was erroneous; and (e) the Plaintiff is currently making economic difficulties after the husband’s death.

B. On the basis of ex officio determination as to the legitimacy of the suit, we examine the following: (i) the details of the unpaid indemnity in the notice of this case: (iii) the payment demand and late payment charge as stated in the separate sheet; and (iv) the parts concerning late payment charge

If the evidence stated in the Evidence Nos. 1 through 13 as above is added to the statements in the Evidence Nos. 1 through 13, the following 2 and 3th following the first demand for each of the following: (i) with respect to each indemnity stated in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through (iii) on March 7, 2012; (ii) June 18, 2012; and (iii) July 2, 2013.