logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.17 2016나2027373
유류분반환청구 등
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal, claims extended by this court, and defendant G's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship I between the plaintiffs and the defendants and the co-defendant D of the first instance trial (hereinafter "D") married in the 1940s and placed the plaintiffs, the defendants, the J, and the K under the chain.

B. On July 25, 2012, the deceased I’s pre-living gift 1) D-related net I sold the land in 940,000,000,000 won, and then donated KRW 600,000,000 out of the purchase price to Doz D. (2) Defendant E-related unit M around January 10, 200, with Defendant E as its purchaser, around January 10, 200, 56 Dong 207 (hereinafter “O apartment”).

30,000,000 won (hereinafter referred to as “the purchase fund of this case”)

(2) The sales contract of this case (hereinafter referred to as “instant sales contract”)

b) The conclusion of the contract was completed on February 16, 200, and accordingly, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the three complexes of the O apartment including the O apartment in this case. Since 2002, the reconstruction procedure was initiated on the O apartment in this case, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on January 22, 2003 with respect to the O apartment in this case on the ground of trust to the reconstruction association on June 23, 2003, and the registration of destruction was completed on June 23, 2003.

C) The rebuilding charges of KRW 43,447,00 for rebuilding charges of KRW 43,47,00 (hereinafter “instant rebuilding charges”) at the net’s expense on February 2, 2006, when the rebuilding procedure was in progress, and the rebuilding charges of KRW 43,447,00 for rebuilding charges together with

(D) A registration of ownership preservation was made in the future of Defendant E on March 7, 2006 with respect to the real estate newly constructed according to reconstruction (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

E) Meanwhile, around December 12, 2012, Defendant H transferred the ownership registration of the instant apartment on the ground of sale as of November 12, 2012. On the same day, Defendant H made the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage with respect to the instant apartment as of the maximum debt amount of KRW 220 million, Defendant H, and Defendant H, the mortgagee, and the mortgagee. Defendant G-related A) on April 18, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant G-related real estate”).

arrow