logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.11.18 2015나1383
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid additionally shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant Jeju 4.3 Victims’ Bereaved Family Association (hereinafter “Defendant organization”) is an unincorporated association established on October 30, 198 by consisting of some of the bereaved families of the victims of the Jeju 4.3 Incident and Defendant B is C of the Defendant organization for the purpose of various projects, etc. to restore their legal and institutional honor to those who have sacrificed on the Jeju 4.3 Incident.

B. Around 14:00 on September 2, 2013, the Plaintiff, a representative of the Internet “D organization, attended a seminars on the issue of designation of the 20th floor of the Seoul Press Center at the 20th international conference room (hereinafter “instant seminars”). The main contents of the seminars are as follows: “The truth of Jeju 4.3 case was found back, and the special act and the government report of April 3, 2006 related thereto are as follows: 4.3 column of Article 2-4.3 column of the false and date-2-3 column; and in the past past calendar regime, the Plaintiff should immediately take measures on the 4.3 policy in the past calendar regime.”

C. Meanwhile, the instant seminars also attended and made remarks by the “G” organization. The contents of the instant seminars include that “The truth of Jeju 4.3 was completely back after the passage of H and I regime, and most of the Jeju-do residents are benefiting.”

Accordingly, the Defendant’s organization announced the name statement on the quasi-Dong-dong of the extreme calendar, “Do residents,” which is the interest of Jeju-do residents, on the opposition to the designation of the 4.3 Memorial Year. The main content of the name is to fill up the fact that remuneration personnel, such as the Plaintiff, etc., such as the Plaintiff, etc., are opposing the designation of the 4.3 memorial day by holding the seminars in this case, and the “A (the Plaintiff) as the president of the D Organization, who is called as the head of Jeju-do origin, is greater.

"4.3 Special Act and 4.3 Government Reports" are deemed to be "4.3 Mono.2," and "Do residents' 80% of the Do residents' Do residents' 80% of the Do residents' Do as soon as possible".

arrow