A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has served as a staff member of G Service under the Korea Railroad Corporation.

1. On May 19, 2014, at around 20:26, the Defendant: (a) laid down the victim I into the second floor of the G basin located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do; (b) laid down KRW 72,000 in cash on the wall; and (c) laid down the victim’s 72,00 in cash on the wall.

2. At around 05:50 on June 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by taking the victim J’s cell phone cases from the large-scale room in the above G G basin; (b) citing the mobile phone cases owned by the victim; and (c) taking off one of the LG electronic options devices equivalent to KRW 500,000 at the market price in the subsequent case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial testimony of each part of the witness K, L, M and N;

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the accused in the examination protocol of suspect;

1. Each police statement made to J, M, K, I,O, and N;

1. Each CCTV (4 places near the scene of the crime in the G calendar);

1. Determination of the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion of an investigation report (the result of execution of a written request for provision of data verifying communications)

1. The alleged defendant found a wall that was separated from the floor of the calendar room and transferred it to M as soon as he found, and there was no theft of cash from the room. In the case of the mobile phone, the defendant entered the guide room where the defendant was expected to work at the time when he received the cell phone case from the customer at the time, and opened the room to the customer support room because he did not receive any information, and then sent the case to the customer support room after he finished the guidance service on the train that entered into the three knife and G, and there was no fact that he stolen the mobile phone in the case.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the aforementioned evidence duly examined and adopted by the court, the facts charged against the Defendant are reasonable.