logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.01.18 2017고단2525
강요등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The defendant shall order the completion of the child abuse treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 7, 2014, B, who is the defendant, had the victim gave birth to his or her father on June 18, 2015 by having sexual intercourse with the victim C (M, June 2002, and 12 years old at the time).

The Defendant and B agreed to raise and protect the friendship of the victim, the victim, and the offspring who the victim gave birth at the Defendant’s home. The Defendant and B lived with the victim and their offspring in the front city D Apartment E residential area from June 23, 2015 to June 25, 2017.

On the other hand, on June 2015, the Jeonbuk Provincial Police Agency started the investigation into B on the charge of rape of minors against victims.

1. Around July 12, 2015, the Defendant forced the victim to make a statement to the effect that, in comparison with the above investigation, “B was unable to reject the sexual intercourse due to the inconvenience of the loss,” she could no longer lead the victim, and she would turn off his/her her her her son and her her son, and eventually her her her son and her her her son will turn down her her her her her her her son, and her her her her her her her her son will not want to go at the divorce home.” On July 13, 2015, the Defendant made the police officer in charge of the F Center to the effect that “B refused the sexual relationship, but her her her son was off his/her her her her her clothes by using the fact that there was no two arms, and caused his/her her her her her son to do so.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim to commit an act that is not obligated to do so.

[Supplementary to the Grounds] The statements of the victim concerning this part of the facts charged are very specific, and the whole is consistently and repeatedly made.

On the other hand, the defendant's appeal against this is not persuasive at all.

In light of the victim and B's age, gender, relationship, etc., the victim stated in the investigative agency at the time of 2015.

arrow