Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of freight cars as C.

On July 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on July 25, 2017, and proceeded along the two lanes of the five-lane between the riverside north-ro in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government World Cup 243-48, using the riverside in the opposite intersection between the opposite intersection and the opposite intersection between the opposite intersection and the opposite intersection.

In this case, a person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front side and the left side and the left side and the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to discover the E-ray car of the victim D(50) driving along the three-lanes from the two-lanes while changing the course to the three-lanes, and instead received the left part of the victim’s vehicle as the front part of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle. At the same time, the Defendant suffered a confluent base for the passenger vehicle requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment, and at the same time, runs away without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the said E-ray car to ensure that the repair cost would amount to KRW 4,817,448, and immediately stopping the vehicle to KRW 4,817,48.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement of occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A criminal investigation report (voluntary report of a suspect);

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis and estimate;

1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the point of failing to take measures after the accident)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that an agreement has been reached between the victim and the victim and the victim are also admitted to the mutual aid association, and the defendant has the same type as this case.