logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.04.24 2014고합39
강간등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant was married on October 2, 2008 with the victim C (n, 30 years of age) and October 2, 2008. However, on December 6, 2012, the victim filed a divorce lawsuit against the Defendant and pending a divorce lawsuit. A.

On September 208, 2008, the Defendant threatened the victim by driving the Defendant’s car (EFa) near the Hanhae-si (EFa) with the Defendant’s car onto the Defendant’s car (EFa) and driving the said car at a speed of about 100km, while driving the said car at a speed of about 100km, the Defendant threatened the victim by driving around approximately 500 meters away from the opposite lane.

B. On August 2010, the Defendant: (a) discovered a victim on the roads near Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; (b) found the victim on the back of the taxi that she was working in his/her friendship with his/her natives; (c) held the back of the taxi and forced the victim to leave the taxi; and (d) assaulted the victim on the part of his/her handbag cited by the victim by cutting down the handbag used by the victim on the bed floor; and (c) brea the victim’s brea on the

C. At around 20:00 on December 2, 2012, the Defendant, at the home of the Defendant and the victim, who was in Kimhae-si F, demanded the sexual intercourse between the victim and the victim who was suffering from diving himself, but the victim was forced to remove the victim’s bridge on the ground that he was forced to remove the victim’s body on the part of the victim, and then came up with one hand of the victim’s body. The Defendant raped the victim by taking the victim’s bridge into force on the part of the victim’s body, making it impossible for the victim to strongly divide the victim’s chest part into the victim’s chest part with the Defendant’s body, making it impossible to reflect, and having sexual intercourse one another with the victim.

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of intimidation is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and the charge of assault is a crime falling under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act, and the charge of assault is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and is clearly

arrow