logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.08.11 2016고단1680
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a KS5 car.

On March 20, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on March 20, 2016, and continued to drive the said car at a speed of about 30 km in the speed of 235 Cheong-ro, Daegu Bank Geum-gu, Daegu, with the direction of the intersection in front of the Cheong-gu, Daegu Bank Geum-gu, Daegu, as the yellow-do off distance from the yellow-ro, which is about 5-lane, at a speed of about 30 km.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, there was a duty of care to make a person engaged in driving service thoroughly and safely drive the car line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went beyond the median line and was negligent in leaving the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the left part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and was placed in front of the left part of the Defendant’s vehicle, with the signal going to the opposite part. The Defendant was placed in front of the left part of the victim E(the 33-year-old driving vehicle) driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E such as culp feum, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and escaped without any necessary measures such as stopping the feat passenger car to the victim G (6 years) who is the feat of the feat passenger car, requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, resulting in the injury of the feat feat, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim H (6 years of age), and resulting in the victim I (2 years of age)’s uneasiness in need of treatment for about one week of treatment. At the same time, the Defendant destroyed the feat passenger car to the extent equivalent to KRW 1,076,348 of the repair cost, such as exchange of the preceding feat, and then escaped without any necessary measures such as aiding the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a survey report, each written diagnosis, and written estimate;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts (the point of absence of measures after damage to property) of the relevant Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of penalty;

arrow