The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are dismissed in entirety.

The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. From April 20, 2012 to May 25, 2016, the Plaintiffs concluded an insurance contract with Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant D”) (attached Form) (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant D”), specifying each insurance contract listed in the No. 1 to 11, 13, and 15, such as the table No. 1 to 15 of the current status of insurance coverage (hereinafter referred to as the “No. 13 F Insurance Contracts”) by referring to the “instant n Insurance Contracts,” and referring to each of the above insurance contracts as the general term “each of the instant insurance contracts”).

B. According to the documents related to the conclusion of each of the instant insurance contracts, the Plaintiffs stated that, while entering into each of the instant insurance contracts, they received insurance design from Defendant D’s insurance solicitors listed in the following table, and received product specifications, subscription plans, etc.

A A A A A A C C C B C C B C B C E E B B B H H H H H G G E E EI E

C. After paying and maintaining insurance proceeds in accordance with the instant insurance contract, the Plaintiffs applied for the suspension of payment of insurance proceeds on each relevant day through Defendant D Call Center for each insurance contract Nos. 7, 8, 13, and 15 as listed below. On each of the insurance contracts No. 1 through 6 of the instant case, the Plaintiffs terminated automatic transfer and suspended payment of insurance proceeds. On September 2018, each of the instant insurance contracts was terminated.

A B C B C B B H B H H C C C A [based basis for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-13, Eul evidence No. 2 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. Upon the recommendation of Defendant E, an insurance solicitor belonging to Defendant D, the Plaintiffs entered into each of the instant insurance contracts No. 1 and No. 2 on April 20, 2012, and paid the insurance premium on November 16, 2012. On August 22, 2014, the Plaintiffs would be an alternative payment from the already paid insurance premium if the payment of the said insurance premium is suspended.

(2) suspend the payment of the above insurance contract.