beta
Text
1. Defendant D’s medical corporation’s KRW 2,00,000 and its amount are annually from November 4, 2009 to September 10, 2020.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On November 4, 2009, the Plaintiff received the recommendation from the above hospital that the blood cT (computer-scam shooting) needs not confirm whether the blood scambling of the human mission was abnormal in the E Hospital. On November 4, 2009, the Plaintiff was transferred to the F medical clinic (Gu G hospital; hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) operated by the Defendant medical corporation D (hereinafter “Defendant corporation”) (hereinafter “Defendant corporation”).
B. Defendant B, the nurse, prescribed the blood cT to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B, the nurse, conducted the reaction test and the singing test (the examination to confirm whether a small amount of biochemical salt was influorous condition of the patient, even if a small amount of biochemical salt was immediately injected into the bloodline before the operation of the singinging test).
C. Defendant B transferred the Plaintiff to Defendant C, a radiation engineer at Defendant Hospital, and Defendant C performed CT shooting by administering the steering system to the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff, while he was administered the steering agents, did not increase the number of cells on the part of the Plaintiff, such as hand, etc., and the body was fluorous or general fluorous fluor. On the same day, the Defendant Hospital’s doctor prepared a written request for medical treatment stating the above contents, and took measures to transfer the Plaintiff to the I Hospital (hereinafter “I Hospital”).
E. On November 4, 2009, at around 10:09, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the medical personnel of the I Hospital with an emerculation emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric
F. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant B and C on the charge of causing occupational injury, and the prosecutor in charge brought a prosecution against the Defendant B and C on the charge of causing occupational injury.
G. On September 24, 2013, the first instance court (Seoul Southern District Court 2013dan2068) (Seoul Southern District Court) is the Seoul Southern District Court.