The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment of six months, the order to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours, the confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant’s immediate deletion of the photographed material after shooting and did not spread or spread it to others, but continues to repeat the same kind of crime without being aware of the punishment more than twice, and that it is not good to transfer the type of crime, the punishment determined by the lower court, taking into account the circumstances as seen in the grounds for the sentencing, is appropriate, and is not too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.