Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The date of seizure (No. 1) divers (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On March 17, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of eight months with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court, two years from September 21, 2006, and one year and six months from imprisonment with prison labor for attempted larceny at the Seoul Western District Court on December 30, 2009, and one year and six months from August 18, 201 with prison labor for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Western District Court on November 25, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 11, 2015.

On November 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) placed in Gyeyang-gu C, Soyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, 09:50 on 14, 2015; (b) placed the cash equivalent to KRW 300,000 in cash owned by the victim E, located within 153 in the clothes 153, in a cresh, and then taken the cash in the manner of cutting back, using the cresh in which the cash amount of KRW 300,000 is neglected.

In addition to theft, from July 11, 2015 to December 16:20, 2015, approximately KRW 5.160,00 in total by the same method over 13 times, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form from July 11, 2015, to December 16:20, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement in E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M,O, P, P, and Q;

1. Report on occurrence (thief) and report on occurrence of the same kind of incident (11/15, 11/22, 10/25);

1. A criminal investigation report (at the request of a seizure warrant, such as confirmation of access persons who are common to each date of the crime, and servers possessing the suspect, etc.), and a criminal investigation report;

1. Photographss and photographs of the suspect at the place of each crime;

1. Previous conviction: A written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, a report on investigation (the confirmation of criminal history of the same kind), and a report on the examination of the accused prepared by a prosecutor;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed systematically and systematically;

1. Article 332 of the Criminal Act of this Act concerning criminal facts.