beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On August 14, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court on January 23, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern Southern District Court.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Around 13:00 on March 2, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would purchase six computers to the victim” at D stores operated by the victim C in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B-426.
However, the defendant was thought to immediately dispose of the above ladrid to a third party, and there was no intention to pay the price to the victim.
The Defendant was issued from the victim the amount equivalent to KRW 194,00 at two market prices of CNVIO V6 1TB other than TB.
2. On March 28, 2013, the Defendant stated that, at G stores operated by the Victim F, the Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul E, 15:50 on March 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) “The Defendant would immediately transfer the payment to the Defendant when he/she delivers the seven computer units to the Mapo H Prize; (b) the Defendant first changed the payment when he/she delivers the seven computer units to the Mapo H Prize.”
However, the defendant was thought to immediately dispose of the above ladrid to a third party, and there was no intention to pay the price to the victim.
The Defendant received from the victim the amount equivalent to KRW 200,000 at the market price of two external hard disks in the above false language.
3. At around 13:00 on July 12, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would want to purchase seven computers” to the victim at Kcomputer operated by the victim J in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City. First of all, the Defendant would first request that “I want to purchase seven computers.”
However, the defendant was thought to immediately dispose of the above ladrid to a third party, and there was no intention to pay the price to the victim.
The Defendant received from the victim the above false statements the amounting to KRW 285,000 on three and three market values of the three spande drive and the spande drive outside the spande drive.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;