beta
Text
1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed C are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. A. On June 1, 2016, the Defendant entered into a contract with KC Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “KC Construction”) under which he/she entered into each of the following contracts: (a) Choju-si Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant Jeonju-si Construction”) from the Choju-si Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “KC Construction”); (b) Hanju-si Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea New Public Co., Ltd.”), on August 22, 2016 (hereinafter “Korea New Public Co., Ltd.”); and (c) Choju-si Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant Primary Construction”).
B. The Defendant entered into a contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff with the content that the Plaintiff carries out the pre-owner and the prime owner of the instant case, and that the Defendant would have 5% of the direct construction cost as the Defendant’s profit out of the amount that the Defendant received as the pre-owner or the prime owner’s construction cost from the K
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”), . [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry in Gap 4-1, Gap 5-1, Gap 6-1, Eul 1-4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion and the selection of the Plaintiff were the Defendant’s employees who provided labor at the site of the Jeonju or prime construction. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff’s wages of KRW 34,00,000 [the Plaintiff’s wages of KRW 22,00,000 (one day’s wages of KRW 20,000) that provided labor at the site of the instant prime construction work from October 1, 2016 to January 2017 (one day’s wages of KRW 20,000) that provided labor at the site of the instant prime construction work (one day’s wages of KRW 20,000). The Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 5,160,000 (one day’s wages of KRW 20,000) that provided labor at the site of the instant prime construction work from August 2, 201 to January 20, 2015).
Since the Plaintiff paid the above KRW 5,160,000 to the designated parties on behalf of the Defendant, the Defendant is obligated to pay the above money as a reimbursement for reimbursement. If the relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is not recognized, the Defendant’s unjust enrichment equivalent to KRW 34,00,000 as the Plaintiff’s provision of labor.