logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.05.13 2013고단313
횡령
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

By June 16, 2008, the Defendant served as an auditor of C (the trade name changed on July 24, 2009, and D) and agreed with C in order for E Co., Ltd., which received funds from the said company, to engage in activities to receive orders for overseas subcontracting, and to acquire half of the agreed amount equivalent to five percent of the agreed amount per share as an honorarium.

By January 2008, the Defendant arranged to obtain a subcontract for the tar Corporation of Hyundai Heavy Industries, KRW 8 billion, and KRW 3 billion,000,000,000,000 to Mexico Construction, and accordingly, the Defendant acquired each claim of KRW 55,00,000,000,000,000,000 to be paid by the E Company, and KRW 275,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

On April 30, 201, Police Officers delegated the collection of the above agreed amount claim of KRW 275 million and loan claim of KRW 100 million to E Co., Ltd., and received KRW 100 million from E Co., Ltd. on the ground of the Defendant’s claim of KRW 650 million plus the Defendant’s claim of KRW 275 million and the Defendant’s claim of KRW 650 million. On June 30, 201, Ulsan District Court Decision 2011TTT10891, Jun. 30, 201, filed an application for seizure and collection order against Samsung Engineering Co., Ltd. on the ground of the Defendant’s claim of KRW 275 million and KRW 100 million, and received KRW 100 million from E Co., Ltd. on July 28, 2011.

Accordingly, among the above KRW 100 million after deducting KRW 16 million for claims collection expenses from KRW 84 million, 48,460,000 ( KRW 84,000 x 37,500 ± 65,000) divided in proportion to the amount of claims between the defendant and the stock company and the victim E.

Nevertheless, this was not delivered to the victim but voluntarily consumed at the seat of Daejeon Metropolitan City and embezzled KRW 48,460,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the accused in the examination record of suspect;

1. Protocol of the prosecutorial statement concerning G;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. A complaint;

arrow