1. The defendant's money stated in the "total amount of award" in attached Form 2 to the plaintiffs and the amount of award.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties, etc. 1) The Defendant Company is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling all kinds of internal combustion engines parts. The Plaintiff 1 through 42 is the Youngdong Factory of the Defendant Company (hereinafter “Ydong Factory”).

) Workers working in the workplace, and the rest of plaintiffs 43 through 55 are the Agsan factory of the defendant company (hereinafter referred to as "agin factory").

2) The Plaintiffs have been working for the P Trade Union A, an industrial trade union, as an industrial trade union, or a union A, Dong Branch of the same union A (hereinafter referred to as the “Aol Branch of the P Trade Union”), as an industrial trade union (hereinafter referred to as the “Aol Branch of the Union”), to join and join the said two branches (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiffs’ union”).

B. On January 13, 2010, the Plaintiffs’ union and the Defendant Company agreed pursuant to the “Agreement on the Improvement of the Party’s Wages and Work-Based Systems” (hereinafter “Agreement”). The said agreement includes the content that “the purpose of introducing the two-way system on January 1, 201, taking into account the economic situation and all the relevant conditions.” (ii) the Plaintiffs’ union demanded the Defendant Company to participate in the special collective bargaining based on the said agreement.

Accordingly, from January 18, 201 to May 4, 2011, the Plaintiffs’ unions and the Defendant Company continued to participate in special negotiations regarding the introduction of a two-way alternative system on a 11-time basis.

However, the special negotiations between the plaintiffs' union and the defendant company were eventually displayed.

3) On May 3, 2011, the Plaintiffs’ Trade Union applied for mediation of a labor dispute to the Chungcheong Regional Labor Relations Commission. On May 13, 2011, the said commission made a decision to suspend mediation without submitting a mediation proposal on the grounds of a significant difference in the position between labor and management. (c) The Plaintiffs’ Trade Union and the Defendant Company’s lock-out 1) made a decision to suspend mediation against its members from May 17, 201 to May 10, 2011.

In the above-mentioned pros and cons voting, the defendant company's Daegu factory.