Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 14, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Gwangju District Court on February 22, 2013 and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 22, 2013.

1. The defendant of "2014 high-level728" is a person who drives a motor vehicle by obtaining a franchise;

On 22:00 on 28:20 on 2010, the Defendant driven the upper vehicle without a car driver's license, and moved the intersection of the Tri-dong Tri-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, into the direction from the side of the inner apartment.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by securing the necessary distance to avoid conjection with the motor vehicle in front.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and makes it a right-hand.

In the same direction, the parts of the Do driver car which is parked in the same lane were moved back to the front part of the vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E (the 32 years of age) by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, which requires approximately one day medical treatment.

2. The Defendant of “2014 High-level 1666” runs a unregistered credit business by lending money by taking a vehicle as security. F is engaged in the mutual construction business of G, and H is a person engaged in the mutual construction business of “I”, and the Defendant, F, and H are the ray and follow-up of the term “folch wave”, which is a violence organization in Gwangju City as a stage of its activities.

around 19:00 on December 17, 2012, the Defendant lent KRW 1.9 million to the injured party J (32 years of age) in the Gwangju Northern-dong, and had been provided as security and kept by the injured party about KRW 10,000,000 in the market price, and then arbitrarily embezzled it, and the injured party took it back and remitted KRW 2,00,000 to the Defendant under the pretext of debt repayment, but did not return the said car.

1. Defendant, F, and F.