A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Each application for compensation order filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed in entirety.

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below in light of the above legal principles, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, and by misapprehending the legal principles as to the violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. The court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

On September 2017, the Defendant conspiredd with the above Bosing staff K, etc. in order with the above Bosing staff, etc., by receiving a proposal for the defect of the crime from the above Bosing staff, etc., and accepting the proposal, thereby assuming the prosecutor’s office, assuming the investigator, and performing the role of telephoneing to the victims.

【Criminal Facts】

1. According to the public offering and role sharing as above, on December 1, 2017, the public official in charge of false names calls the victim D from the Chinese Buddhist land (hereinafter referred to as the “FF”) around December 1, 2017 to the victim D, and the fact is not the public prosecutor or investigator, and the victim’s passbook was not used by the victim’s passbook due to the illegal use of the victim’s name. Notwithstanding the fact that the victim’s passbook was not used by the passbook, the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office misrepresenting the victim, and the victim was 190 persons, and the victim was 190 persons. The amount deposited in the new account is 190 persons. The false statement stating that “the money deposited in the current account is returned to the Financial Supervisory Service employee sent by us to check whether the money was related to the crime.” On the same day, another employee in charge of name or name was given from the victim the cash 90 million won in the preceding case.

The Defendant, in collusion with the Defendant’s name misscising assistance staff, is above 33 times in total, from September 18, 2018, as indicated in the list of crimes (1).