1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Plaintiff A and B corresponding to the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs are professors of E University, and the defendant works as the secretary general of F of the school foundation and the secretary general of E University.

나. 피고의 발언 1) 피고는 2014. 12. 14. E대학교 G학과 학생인 H, I, J, 기획조장실장 K, 교학처장 L이 있는 자리에서 “실습재료는 학교에서 대부분 다 해줘야 되는데, 학생들이 왜 그걸 샀느냐고 묻는 거야. 그니깐 학생들이 지금 피해를 많이 봤잖아 실질적으로. 학교에서 실습할 때 피부든 헤어든 학교에서 나온 재료다. 이걸로 실습해라 한 적이 있냐고.”라고 말하였다(이하 ‘이 사건 ㉠발언’이라고 한다

(2) On January 28, 2015, the Defendant: “A professor and B were male and female professors, and the Defendant was issued a new name to laund their status in Q, and he was found at a university where A had worked in Gwangju, thereby making it difficult for the wife to obtain B and head bonds. Moreover, the Defendant was aware of the date without knowledge in Gwangju, so it would be known to the reporters.”

(hereinafter referred to as “the statement of this case”) C.

1) On February 5, 2015, the plaintiffs filed a complaint against the plaintiffs, stating that they received unfair costs for practical training in relation to the speech of the Supreme Court of Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office. The plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendant that damaged the honor of the plaintiffs A and B by openly pointing out false facts in relation to the statement of the case in this case. 2) The prosecutor of the office of the office of the office of the branch office of the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office, where the criminal cases related to the speech of the case in this case were pending on July 17, 2015, in relation to defamation related to the speech of the case in question, the defendant appears to be the end in the process of confirming the contents thereof with respect to defamation related to the speech of the case in relation to the speech of the case in question on July 17, 2015.