logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.03.26 2016가합544226
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The part concerning the claim for reimbursement of litigation costs in the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff 85,867.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant F Co., Ltd. (former trade name: G Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Defendant Construction Company”).

(2) Defendant D is a manager and supervisor of the construction work in charge of each of the above factories, and the actual representative of Defendant Construction Company. (2) Defendant B and C are those engaged in driving service for each of their own vehicles, who are engaged in transportation, loading, unloading, etc. under the direction of Defendant D and receive the urgency.

3) Defendant E Co., Ltd. (former trade name: J., hereinafter “Defendant Insurance Company”).

(4) The Plaintiff is a person who holds a first-class national technical qualification certificate of a building engineer and was employed by L by a human resources contractor and worked as a daily construction worker from January 2014 to January 1, 2014.

B. At around 16:00 on March 11, 2014, Defendant D instructed Defendant C and B to transport approximately 16 sn beam lines ( approximately 10m, 15cm in width, and approximately 7 tons in weight) in front of the N station in the PH construction site of the above H construction site. In order to prevent the theft of the sn beam lines temporarily loaded at the above N station, Defendant D intended to transfer the sn beam lines to the above H construction site. Meanwhile, Defendant D did not call that Defendant B et al. would not have any safety personnel who direct or induce the work around the loading and unloading site so that they could not have access to the surrounding area. Defendant B did not have any safety personnel who directed or induce the work around the loading and unloading site. Defendant B did not request Defendant D to do the above work.

Accordingly, Defendant D brought high-ranking trees to the Plaintiff who was a father of the said I Construction Site at the construction site at the above H construction site.

arrow