beta
Text
The accused shall announce the summary of the judgment of innocence.
Reasons
Public Prosecutor's Office
1. Around June 2009, the Defendant forged private documents using a computer on the paper of a certificate of qualification which is set up a gold tamper for the purpose of uttering at a place unfluoring site (fluoring. 1) for the purpose of uttering. The Defendant entered the above certificate of qualification into the “C” on June 30, 2009, stating that he completed the process of paper utilization (fluoring, i.e., coloring, i., coloring, i.e., class 1) and affixed a seal of an incorporated association created by the Defendant in advance on the name of the above corporation.
As a result, the Defendant forged the certificate of qualification in the name of C, an incorporated association, which is a private document concerning the certification of facts, and around that time, forged the certificate of qualification in the name of C, an incorporated association, 15 times in total as shown in the attached list of crimes.
2. On June 2009, the Defendant issued to D, E, F, G, H, and I a paper-use certificate under the name of C, an incorporated association, which was forged as described in paragraph (1), to D and used it. Around that time, the Defendant issued a paper-use certificate under the name of the said incorporated association, which was forged, to D and E, F, H, and I as if it was genuine.
However, the Defendant consistently asserts to the effect that he/she issued a certificate of qualification with the permission of the JJ, which is an adviser of the said legal entity, from the investigative agency to this court.
In the telephone conversation with police officers, the J only stated that the officer of the said corporation was not in charge of the officer of the said corporation and that he was consulted with K of the said corporation and that he was not related to the said corporation (Evidence No. 134 of the Evidence Records). However, the J voluntarily introduced himself as an adviser of the said corporation on his own books or Internet painting (Evidence No. 127 of the Evidence No. 127 and reference materials submitted by the said corporation to this court on September 29, 2016).