1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) The Plaintiff is a company running apartment management business, etc., and the Plaintiff is a company conducting apartment management business, etc., on October 31, 2012, the North-gu Seoul apartment house (hereinafter “instant apartment house”).

The council of occupants' representatives consisting of representatives from each Dong (hereinafter "the council of occupants' representatives of this case").

2) As to the instant apartment management contract and the consignment management contract (hereinafter “instant consignment management contract”)

A) A. From December 8, 2012, the management of the above apartment was commenced. The main contents of the instant consignment management contract are as follows. The president D(hereinafter referred to as “A”) of the council of occupants’ representatives of the apartment in this case (Evidence A) are as follows.

(2) The defendant representative director E (hereinafter referred to as "B")

A) Under Article 43(2) of the Housing Act, apartment houses, incidental facilities and welfare facilities (hereinafter referred to as apartment houses, etc.) shall be multi-unit houses of Party A.

The purpose of Article 1(1) of the General Provisions of Chapter I is to select B as the managing body of the collective housing of the Party A under Article 2 subparag. 12(c) of the Housing Act. Article 6(1) of the same Act is to manage the apartment of this case as one of the good managers’ care in complying with the housing-related Acts and subordinate statutes, the Acts and subordinate statutes related to the management of collective housing, and the management rules of Party A. Article 12(1) of the same Act.

4. A or.