Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

From July 3, 2015 to 21:50 of the same month from July 24, 2015, the Defendants installed 28 outdoor game machines without being rated together with E, the game room business owner, and had many and unspecified customers play a game using the said game machine, and requested them to exchange points obtained through the game in cash after deducting 10% from the above points points in terms of fees.

As a result, the Defendants provided game products not classified by E in collusion with E for use, and they shared the points points obtained by customers through the use of game products as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Criminal facts under Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 1 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Promotion of respective Game Industry Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (limited to cases where business of exchanging results acquired through the use of game products is conducted for exchange of game products) concerning criminal facts, and selection of imprisonment with labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation Defendant B: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation Defendant A: Crimes No. 1 of the grounds for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry / [the scope of recommending punishment / [the scope of recommending punishment ] Type 3 (business of speculative conduct, etc. in the use of game products) and the scope of mitigation (4-10 months) [the scope of recommending punishment] 2 of simple participation [the scope of recommending punishment / Provision of use of illegal game products] are aggravated by simple participation in the mitigation area (4-10 months and re-purchase business] of Type 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry.