logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.27 2015고단7981
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 12, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, who is in charge of harvesting in the dry field near the city in the D restaurant located in Busan Northern-gu, Busan-gu, stating, “I will get 7 women who will get out of the field near the city with a woman who will work for the dry field.”

However, in fact, the defendant needs to pay money for personal purposes, and the defendant is able to do so with the intention of preparing it, without the intention or ability to take the body of the victim into consideration.

It was false.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 7,00,000 from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the Defendant’s name on June 13, 2012 under the name of a vice-median deposit on five occasions from the victim.

2. On June 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) received a notice from the victim of the instant accident by telephone in the remote area of Busan (hereinafter referred to as Busan) around Jun. 14, 2012; (b) “The Defendant did not seem to have caused the accident to the wind that the female to leave out the accident caused by the accident.”

Women to reach an agreement with victims of accidents can work, but there is no money to reach an agreement.

Along with a loan of KRW 300,000,000, a false statement was made to the effect that it would be repaid with the money by using it as an agreed deposit.

However, in fact, the defendant made a false statement that it is necessary to pay a traffic accident agreement to raise additional money.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 3,00,000,00 from the injured party as the borrowed money on or around June 14, 2012, from the account as stated in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on trading specification lists;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the suspended execution shall be based on Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the reflection of crimes, the repayment of some amount of money, and other factors, such as the records of the defendant, the method

arrow