1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs and claims filed by plaintiffs C and D expanded by this court are dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasons for this part of this Court’s reasoning are as stated in Paragraph 1 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(hereinafter referred to as "herb" is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance). The second ground of 7-9 shall be as follows:

【2) Plaintiff A filed the instant lawsuit on the premise that it is a de facto spouse of the Deceased. Plaintiff B is a child produced by Plaintiff A with K, and Plaintiff C and D are the siblings of the Deceased.

The third side 1-10th am. 1th am. 1) The Deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant hospital from May 1, 2014 to June 15, 2014, and was hospitalized in the Defendant hospital. On May 1, 2014, the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital performed the heart, spolog, and spologic test to the Deceased before performing the right-hand spologic surgery. At the time, there was “the epologic function disorder, the spologic function assessment: the epologic function assessment: the epologic function assessment; the epologic function assessment; and the son prescribed drugs to the Deceased. 2) The Deceased was hospitalized in the outside of the Defendant hospital from around one year to around July 25, 2015, to the left-hand.

On July 6, 2015, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted a heart sacr and a heart test before performing the operation on the left-hand 3 balance of the deceased on the national anesthesia. The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, on the ground that there was a opinion that “the king of the heart sacrine, the sacrific function of the heart sacrife, the completing function of the heart sacrife, the national wall function evaluation: the sports spacife, and the heart spac

3) From January 11, 2016 to January 30, 2016, the Deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital and received an extra-presidential treatment (e.g., removing sludge). The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital did not prescribe drugs with respect to the heart at the time of the death.” 3rd page of the “The Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel did not prescribe drugs with respect to the heart.”