The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the original court (six months of imprisonment) shall be too vague and unfair.

2. The fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected in the judgment is an element of sentencing favorable to the defendant.

However, there is no change in circumstances that may be particularly considered in the sentencing factors against the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times prior to the occurrence of fraud, the Defendant committed again during the period of repeated crime of the same kind, and the failure to agree with the victim, etc., and there is no change in circumstances that are disadvantageous to the Defendant. In full view of all the factors of sentencing indicated in the arguments in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the background and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.