logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.11.05 2015나54924
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract for B dump trucks (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”). Defendant A is the driver and owner of Lone Star Vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant”) and Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Companies”) is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract for the Defendant vehicles.

B. Around 06:30 on March 8, 2008, the instant traffic accident D attempted to drive the Plaintiff’s vehicle and enter the same as the four-lane crossing the front side of the public sports site located adjacent to the Nam-dong, Yangsan-si, along the direction of the width of the center 2.4m wide, in order to go back to the airside in Yangsan-si, which is the direction of the width of the center. However, as the vehicle’s power failure to turn back at one time due to the collision of the vehicle’s power failure, the back part of the Plaintiff’s loading box of the vehicle intrudes the central line. In this case, the Defendant’s vehicle, which was driving one-lane opposite to the territorial intersection in Yangsan-si, the front part of the Plaintiff’s loaded the Plaintiff’s vehicle beyond the central line, conflicts.

As a result, Defendant A, a driver of Defendant A, who was on board the vehicle, suffered from the injury, such as a 6th left-hand spawed spawed spawed spawd spawd spawd spad spad spad spad spad spad spad spad spad spad spad spad spad spads

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”).

C. Until December 28, 2010, the Plaintiff paid KRW 135,149,80 as insurance proceeds to E, including KRW 131,150,980, KRW 1,392,310, and KRW 2,606,590.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry and video (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings, as a whole, of Gap evidence 1 to 14

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant traffic accident occurred by the Plaintiff’s driver D.

arrow