Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant shall hold the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council for Representatives of Residents from February 2, 2011 to February 2, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the "Council for Representatives of Residents").

The president of the public property committee, the members of the public property committee, and the general affairs were responsible for the management of the above apartment property and the proceeds from the sale of the public property sold due to the reconstruction of apartment, such as distribution to the apartment owners.

The Defendant, as the president of the resident representative meeting, must pay the money of the victim's "D apartment owner" for the purpose prescribed by the management rules, in violation of the duty that requires the consent of the members of the resident representative meeting prior to the disbursement, and in violation of the duty that requires the consent of the members of the resident representative meeting. On February 8, 2013, the Defendant voluntarily withdrawn KRW 10,670,710 from the new bank account (Account Number E) in the name of the resident representative meeting in the name of the Dogdong-dong, Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was opened at the center of the Dogdong-dong, and paid to five persons

Accordingly, the defendant obtained 10,670,710 won property benefits from five employees of the above management office, and the victim suffered property damage equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the written resolution for payment;

1. Article 355 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 355 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. From the second half of the 2012 summary of the assertion, the Korean District Heating Corporation notified of the increase of heating costs from the Korea District Heating Corporation, and it is likely that the heating supply system would not be managed in a manual due to reconstruction relocation households, and therefore, the heating supply system should be adjusted to the employees of the management office while working on holidays and at night and at night.