A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:50 on April 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) divided conversations with D and D, which had been sick in C Hospital No. 408 at C Hospital No. 408, located in D and D in D and D, and (b) concluded that the victim E in the above sick room would interfere with television viewing, and that the victim’s face would be able to interfere with television viewing. In addition, the Defendant sent the victim’s face one time in his/her hand for approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the denial of the degree of injury);

1. E’s statement among the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant against the prosecutor

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] general injury (the scope of recommending punishment) of the sentence of Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence shall be limited to minor injury (one to one year in general) (one to one year in general) and the range of sentence compared to the sentencing sentence of a person who is not subject to punishment: one month to one year (the decision of sentence], four months in imprisonment, one year in suspended sentence, one year in suspended sentence. Unfavorable circumstances: The records of the same kind of crime committed several times in favor of one's mistake, the degree of assault committed by the victim and the degree of damage inflicted on the victim.

Parts of innocence

1. Around 22:50 on April 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) divided the conversations with D and D, which had been written sick in the C Hospital No. 408 of the C Hospital No. 408 located in the C Hospital No. 408; and (b) on the ground that the victim E, who was located in the hospital, was in the hospital, would interfere with television viewing, and the victim’s face would be obstructed, and the Defendant took the victim’s face one time at hand; and (c) the above D, by taking the victim’s head debt in hand, took approximately three weeks for the victim’s treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant, together with D, injured the victim.

2. We examine the judgment, as to whether the defendant committed the crime of this case in collaboration with D, we correspond to this.