Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 9, 2017, at around 13:00, the Defendant sought to find the above C's factory office located in Kimpo-si B, Gyeonggi-do, for the same reason as Paragraph 1, and demanded that the employees of the pertinent company enter the above company as the victim, but neglected this demand and invaded the company within the structure managed by the victims.

In addition, from around that time to January 23, 2017, the Defendant entered the above three times, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 1 (1). The summary of the evidence was invaded.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each statement of E, F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (referring to witness F, G, and E telephone conversations);

1. Article 319 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. The summary of the facts charged shall not allow anyone to reach another person repeatedly in the form of code, text, sound, image, or picture creating fear or apprehensions through an information and communications network;

Nevertheless, at around 08:59 on January 16, 2017, the Defendant repeatedly sent the same language to the victim 43 times, as in the case of the attached Table 1 re-mail, from around 2017 to February 6, 2017, on the ground that the victim C (the age of 45) who was fired at a remote area of the Kimpo-dong, Gyeonggi-do, is not only the victim C (the age of 45) who was at issue, using public telephone and the Defendant’s portable phone, and made a telephone against the victim, thereby causing an apprehension for the victim.

2. Article 74 subparag. 1 subparag. 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. is promulgated or unstable through an information and communications network.