The punishment of the accused shall be determined by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act

A. On March 2018, the Defendant acquired the means of access to a police officer’s early February 2018, the Defendant: (a) told B to the effect that “I will give KRW 1,400,000 per week the passbook and e-mail card connected to two accounts” from the north-gu Si at the end of the port; and (b) received the e-mail card and e-mail card connected to B’s Cbank D and E-cooperative F’s account in the name of B.

B. On September 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from the non-defensee that “on September 12, 2018, the Defendant would give KRW 900,000 per week if he/she sent a physical card, etc.”; and (b) at H convenience points located in G on the same day and on the same day, at H convenience points located in G on the same day.

As stated in Paragraph B, it was transferred by way of entrusting the above convenience store so that the checks and passbooks connected to the transferred accounts and the E UnionF accounts can be found by the winners.

2. On March 1, 2018, as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, the Defendant asked the Defendant to receive a loan in the name of B without the consent of B, and to receive a loan in the name of B, and request I to receive a loan in the name of B.

Accordingly, around March 8, 2018, the Defendant discovered the identification number, etc. of the authorized certificate from the KPagle located in the jurisdiction of the north-gu, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, and sent it to the I. I connected to the “L” pattern on the same day, entered the name, resident registration number, identification number, and identification code, and then entered information such as B’s resident registration number, contact address, correspondence address, e-mail address, etc. in the credit transaction agreement file without authority, and forged one file of the credit transaction agreement file in the name of B, a prior record of the rights and obligations.

The defendant continued to file a written credit transaction agreement with the victim E association, who is not aware of the above fact of the above temporary forfeiture, is authentic.