logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.01.11 2017고단1922
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the Busan District Court Western Branch of the Busan District Court, and on December 30 of the same year, the above judgment became final and conclusive.

"2017 Highest 1922"

1. On July 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant shall open three mobile phone units in the name of the victim, give KRW 300,000 per week to the Defendant, and pay all the mobile phone device values and charges to the Defendant until the end of the third month,” at the front parking lot of the Dong University building, which was accompanied by the victim C in Busan, Busan, Seodong University Building.”

However, even if the defendant opens a mobile phone in the name of the victim, he was willing to sell the mobile phone directly to the company exporting the mobile phone, so he did not have the intention or ability to pay properly the fees or the mobile phone value according to the period of use of the mobile phone.

The defendant, as above, was delivered one mobile phone of the same market price and one type of mobile phone at the ELS Plus Agency in which the market price of 1,00,000 won is unknown at the ELS Plus Agency in which the defendant could not know the specific trade name in the Plus Agency in the Plus Agency of ELS Plus whose market price is equivalent to 6S cell phone and the Plus Agency of Busan Slus where the specific trade name in the Plus Office cannot be known from the victim's deceiving the victim and the victim could not know the specific trade name in the Plus Office of Busan Metropolitan City on the following day at the Llus Agency of Llus whose market price and one type of mobile phone of the same market price cannot be known.

2. On March 15, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around March 15, 2016, the Defendant demanded the victim to terminate the opening of the above three mobile phones issued to the Defendant by the victim, and that “A victim would make a change in the name of three mobile phones by making a small payment of KRW 2.5 million with the mobile phone being used by the victim,” on the part of the victim.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he shall be given the money.

arrow