logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.23 2015누63304
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following items to the “no evidence to be recognized” in Part III of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, according to the statement of No. 8 from 2004 to October 2014, the plaintiff is acknowledged to have received medical treatment several times due to the main high blood pressure, chronic hepatitis, spawnitis, antigrosis, antigrosis, spawnosis, nuclear fladity, and detailed organ pulmonary convergence, the detailed known liver diseases, Habrosis, and the detailed unknown external chrodism, hyrosis, an acute hythrosis without any spathrosis or chrodism, urine hemosis, an infectrosisrosis, and hyrosis, etc. In addition to the above recognized facts and the opinion that the plaintiff's disease in this case is related to the immunity function in the human body due to blood infection, there seems to be room for the plaintiff's existing disease in this case by the above existing disease in this case.

2. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow