The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include: (a) the Defendant informed the investigative agency of the personal information of good faith; (b) the Defendant led to the instant crime; and (c) the Defendant appears to repent of his mistake.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant was punished for the same crime in October of 2010 including the criminal punishment of two years of suspended sentence, and that the defendant was punished for the same crime three times in prison in 2010, the defendant's number of times of medication reaches four times, the fairness in sentencing with the same and similar cases, and the degree of addiction to narcotics and the harm caused by the medication of narcotics, etc., it is necessary to strictly punish and eradicate the administration of narcotics. In addition, considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, motive for the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed appropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.