All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. A summary of the facts charged (1) around 18:50 on July 2, 2015, the Defendant discovered the victim E (n, 20 years of age) who was drunk in front of the D branch, and assaulted the victim on his/her hand at one time on his/her part, without any reason.

(2) At the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant was able to take a bath to the victim while the scam and the surrounding merchants are scam in compliance with the victim, and the Defendant shows that there was a hole at the bottom of the scam. The match thickness.

“Publicly insulting the victim.”

2. Determination of each of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Articles 260(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and can not be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act (the crime of insult) or can be prosecuted only when a complaint is filed under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act (the crime of insult). It is recognized that the damaged E explicitly expresses its intention not to punish the Defendant on September 27, 2016, which is after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, all of the public prosecutions of this case are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 and subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.