1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,033,760,730 as well as 5% per annum from May 21, 2013 to December 21, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. Payment of medical care benefits and confirmation of conviction;

(a) A foundation B was established with the purpose of all charitable activities to help those who are unable to support themselves due to scholarship projects, depression, disasters, and other circumstances;

The defendant is responsible for the representative of the Incorporated Foundation B from February 17, 2003.

(b) In order for the above foundation which is a non-profit corporation established for the purpose of scholarship projects to establish a medical institution, it shall obtain approval for the purpose of profit-making projects from the Office of Education of Gyeongbuk-do, which is the competent authority and

However, on February 6, 2007, the Defendant arbitrarily amended the articles of incorporation without such approval and permission to amend the articles of incorporation, and revised the corporate registration to the effect that “the establishment of the Ycheon-gun C Office” was “the establishment of the Ycheon-gun Office.” On February 6, 2007, the Defendant established the Do Council members to the Ycheon-gun C

C. As such, the Incorporated Foundation B was reported on the establishment of a medical institution without satisfying the requirements to establish the medical institution, and was not a medical institution entitled to medical care benefits, etc. under the Medical Service Act. However, from February 6, 2007 to April 25, 2016, the Defendant was paid medical care benefits of KRW 1,840,027,930 and medical care benefits by employing patients, etc. at D’s clinic and claiming the Plaintiff to provide medical care benefits and medical benefits.

As above, the defendant was convicted of the criminal facts, such as obtaining medical care benefits and medical benefits from the plaintiff, and the judgment became final and conclusive.

(Seoul District Court Decision 2017Gohap286 Decided November 29, 2017, and Daegu High Court Decision 2017No607 Decided May 16, 2018). The grounds for recognition 【No. 1 through 6, respectively, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. A medical institution is established without satisfying the requirements for establishing a judgment medical institution as to the cause of the claim, and an employee medical doctor thereof conducts medical treatment, and the Plaintiff is included in the medical care benefit amount.