beta
Text
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
The defendant alleged the claim to the plaintiff on March 13, 2020.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
가. 원고 등의 지위 및 하도급계약 체결 현황 원고는 건설산업기본법 제2조 제7호의 규정에 따른 토목건축공사업 등을 영위하는 중소기업자로서, 원고는 아래 [표 1] 기재와 같이 주식회사 C(이하 ‘C’이라고 한다. 이하 회사명에서 주식회사의 기재는 모두 생략한다)으로부터 도급받은 ‘D아파트 신축공사(이하 ‘원도급공사’라고 한다) 중 습식공사’(이하 ‘이 사건 공사’라고 한다) 부분을 건설산업기본법 제2조 제8호의 규정에 따른 습식방수 공사업 등 건설전문공사업을 영위하는 중소사업자인 E회사과 하도급계약(이하 ‘이 사건 하도급계약’이라고 한다)을 체결하여 E회사에게 이 사건 공사의 수행을 위탁(이하 ‘이 사건 건설위탁’이라고 한다)하였다.
[Attachment 1] Details of subcontract conclusion (unit: KRW 640, Nov. 15, 2016; KRW 640, Jul. 21, 2017, among the new construction of D apartment during the construction period of D apartment, the first revised contract on Nov. 15, 2016 to Feb. 15, 2017, Feb. 15, 2017; KRW 640, Nov. 15, 2016 to May 30, 2017, the second revised contract on Nov. 15, 2016; KRW 640, Nov. 15, 2016; or July 21, 2017; and
The Plaintiff’s act 1) The Plaintiff’s act of establishing the instant special agreement on November 15, 2016 (hereinafter “instant special agreement”) under the terms and conditions of the contract (a) through (c) of the special subcontract articles and the site descriptions, while entrusting the instant construction to E companies on November 15, 2016.
(A) A) the terms and conditions that impose the costs not included in the estimate on the subcontractor (hereinafter referred to as “special agreement I”) include the special subcontract articles and the site descriptions, and thus, the contents of the special subcontract articles are the drawings of the special subcontract articles, so there is no change of change due to an error or omission in the subsequent estimate.
Provided, That the change of the drawings at the request of the owner, us.