A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2016, at around 21:50 on August 29, 2016, the Defendant, on the road in front of the “C cafeteria” located in Seocheon-si B, was fluoring a fluorous male and obsing, and the fluort E belonging to the D Zone D District Unit, requesting the Defendant to have the Defendant returned home, and prevented the Defendant from fighting, and used the fluor E “Y flustt flus and blus blus blus hum,” and used two fluor E’s chest by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. 112 Report sheet, work log;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTV image data;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act include assaulting a police officer who wears his/her uniform, and thus, the nature of the crime is not good, but it is against the nature of the crime, the absence of any of the same force, the fact that the victim police officer agreed to do so smoothly with the police officer, the circumstances surrounding the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime.