beta
Text
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is a non-corporate group comprised of B apartment units with at least 500 households in the East Sea, which are apartment units with at least 500 households in B apartment units in the East Sea, (the apartment units consisting of at least nine units, 522 units; hereinafter "the apartment units in this case"), and the plaintiff is the representative of the above apartment units 109 unit, who is the defendant's chairperson.
B. On January 7, 2015 and January 16, 2015, the Defendant issued a public notice of the appointment of the operator of the nursery facilities in the instant apartment, and the Defendant participated in the said bidding D and E, and on February 9, 2015, D were selected as the operator of the nursery facilities. However, on February 10, 2015, E presented an objection to the following: “E unfairly presented rent to the Plaintiff; according to the Defendant’s public notice, the participants in the assessment of the operator of the nursery facilities are limited only to the association of parents and their father-child representatives who want to use the nursery facilities; and, at the time of the assessment, those who do not fall under the said group participated in the assessment; 2) on February 15, 2015, five of the representatives present at the Defendant’s extraordinary meeting, which was held as the eight representative of the instant apartment complex, and the Plaintiff opposed to this.
3) On February 16, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement between D and D with regard to the childcare center facilities on the right side of the first floor, 105 apartment complex of this case, with a deposit of KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 80,000. (c) On February 17, 2015, the Plaintiff decided to dismiss the Plaintiff from the president and the Dong representative of the Plaintiff on the ground that “the Plaintiff, among the representatives of the instant apartment buildings, entered into a lease agreement with D who neglected the opinions of the representatives of the Dong, and entered into a lease agreement independently with D who was awarded a successful bid as the operator of the instant apartment childcare facility of this case” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant resolution of dismissal”).
D. D.
Residents' voting, on the other hand, above.